| 1 | Measure OEE, Not Just Rated Speed | Evaluate availability, performance, and quality under the intended production mix. OEE is calculated as: Availability × Performance × Quality. | Record planned production time, downtime, ideal cycle time, total output, and good output. Example: 90% availability × 85% performance × 98% quality = 75.0% OEE. | Factory acceptance-test results, sample production logs, downtime categories, and a clearly defined cycle-time basis. | Compare suppliers using the same material, profile dimensions, tooling setup, batch size, and quality requirements. |
| 2 | Verify Material and Forming Capability | Check whether the machine can process the required steel grade, thickness range, strip width, hole pattern, channel profile, and cut-to-length tolerance. | Confirm published limits in millimetres. Do not treat maximum thickness, maximum width, and maximum line speed as interchangeable specifications. | Validated trial parts, dimensional inspection reports, material certificates, tooling drawings, and a written list of approved material grades. | Require production samples made from the actual coil material and the most demanding profile in the purchase specification. |
| 3 | Assess Tooling Life and Changeover Cost | Review roll-forming tooling materials, heat treatment, surface condition, adjustment method, wear monitoring, and the time required for profile changes. | Tool life must be stated for a defined material, thickness, lubrication condition, profile, and acceptance limit. A life claim without these conditions is not comparable. | Tooling material and hardness records, wear photographs or inspection data, spare-tool pricing, setup instructions, and documented changeover time. | Select the design with predictable wear, repeatable setup, accessible replacement parts, and a total tooling cost calculated over the planned production volume. |
| 4 | Check Electrical Safety and EN 60204-1 Alignment | Review the machine’s electrical equipment, protective bonding, disconnecting means, emergency-stop functions, control circuits, wiring identification, documentation, and verification tests. | EN 60204-1 covers electrical equipment of machines. Compliance should be assessed against the applicable edition and the complete machine risk assessment; it is not automatically proven by a component marking. | Electrical schematics, risk assessment, protective-conductor continuity results, insulation-resistance results, functional test records, emergency-stop validation, and the declaration or conformity documentation required for the installation location. | Have a qualified electrical professional review the design before purchase and verify the completed machine during acceptance testing. |
| 5 | Evaluate Service Response and Spare Parts | Assess remote diagnostics, technician availability, software support, spare-parts stocking, escalation procedures, and support across the machine’s expected operating life. | Define contractual targets such as response acknowledgement within one business day, critical-parts quotation within two business days, and documented escalation for recurring faults. | Service-level agreement, spare-parts list with lead times, preventive-maintenance schedule, troubleshooting guides, training plan, and support contact process. | Score support using measurable response times and parts availability rather than general statements such as “global service.” |
| 6 | Calculate Total Cost of Ownership | Include purchase price, installation, commissioning, energy, compressed air, consumables, tooling, maintenance labour, spare parts, scrap, training, and planned downtime. | Use a common evaluation period, such as five years, and compare cost per good metre or cost per finished channel, not only the initial machine price. | Itemised quotation, utility requirements, energy data under defined load conditions, maintenance intervals, consumable prices, and warranty exclusions. | Prefer the machine with the lowest verified cost per good product when safety, quality, capacity, and compliance requirements are met. |
| 7 | Use a Documented Acceptance Test | Set measurable criteria for speed, dimensional accuracy, hole position, cut length, surface quality, changeover, safety functions, and operator training. | Define the sample size, material condition, inspection method, allowable tolerances, uptime window, and treatment of rework and rejected parts before the machine is shipped. | Approved acceptance-test protocol, inspection equipment list, calibration records, signed test results, punch-list process, and final manuals in the required language. | Link final payment or formal acceptance to objective results, complete documentation, correction of safety issues, and successful production of representative parts. |