| Nitrile-coated knit | General assembly, warehouse handling, automotive maintenance, light fabrication, and oily parts. | Good grip in dry, wet, and moderately oily conditions; good resistance to abrasion and puncture compared with thin disposable gloves. | Usually good Actual cut, tear, and puncture levels depend on the liner, coating thickness, and product design. | Resists many oils and greases better than natural rubber latex. Chemical suitability must be checked against the exact chemical and exposure time. | Not intended for high heat, molten metal, or flame unless specifically tested and certified for those hazards. | Typically high dexterity and breathability when made with a lightweight knitted liner and palm coating. | Coating can degrade in certain solvents, ketones, strong acids, or strong oxidizers. A coated palm may not protect the back of the hand. | Choose a seamless liner for comfort and a textured or micro-foam coating when grip is important. |
| Disposable nitrile | Healthcare, laboratory work, food preparation, cleaning, inspection, and short-duration contamination control. | Good barrier against many common liquids and biological contaminants when intact; latex-free option. | Limited Thin disposable gloves provide little protection against cuts, punctures, impact, or abrasion. | Useful for selected chemicals, but breakthrough time varies significantly by chemical, thickness, temperature, and contact method. | Not suitable for hot surfaces, cryogenic liquids, flame, or thermal work. | Excellent tactile sensitivity and dexterity; generally less durable than reusable gloves. | Must be changed after contamination, damage, or task changes. Do not use as a substitute for chemical-resistant reusable gloves without compatibility data. | Select the thickest practical gauge for the task and consult a chemical-resistance chart for sustained contact. |
| Natural rubber latex | General handling, janitorial work, food handling, and tasks requiring elastic fit and wet grip. | Good elasticity, wet grip, tear resistance, and comfort; can provide useful protection against some water-based substances. | Moderate to good Performance varies widely between disposable, household, and coated designs. | Often unsuitable for oils, fuels, and many organic solvents. Natural rubber proteins can cause allergic reactions in sensitive users. | Poor choice for high heat, molten metal, and flame unless a specialized certified design states otherwise. | Very good flexibility and fit; may become less comfortable with prolonged use in warm, wet conditions. | Latex allergy risk; degradation can occur with oils, ozone, sunlight, and some chemicals. | Use only after evaluating allergy risks and the chemical compatibility requirements of the task. |
| Leather | Material handling, construction, welding-related handling, rigging, landscaping, and protection from rough surfaces. | Good abrasion resistance, durability, grip, and protection against minor sparks and mechanical contact. | Good Heavy leather designs can provide strong abrasion and tear resistance; cut and puncture protection is not automatic. | Poor for many liquids Leather absorbs oils, water, and chemicals unless specially treated. | Can provide limited heat and spark resistance. Welding gloves require appropriate heat and performance testing for the welding process. | Moderate dexterity; usually becomes more flexible after breaking in but may feel bulky. | Wet leather may stiffen or lose performance. It is not a general-purpose chemical glove and does not provide reliable needle-stick protection. | Choose a cuff length and leather grade appropriate to the work; use a certified welding glove for welding operations. |
| HPPE or engineered cut-resistant fiber | Sheet-metal handling, glass handling, food processing, assembly, and work involving sharp edges. | High cut resistance with low weight and good dexterity; often combined with nitrile or polyurethane coatings for grip. | Good to very high cut resistance Cut performance must be confirmed by the applicable EN 388 or ANSI/ISEA 105 rating. | Fiber resistance is not the same as chemical resistance. The coating and liner should be checked separately. | Many HPPE fibers have limited heat resistance and may melt or shrink at elevated temperatures; do not assume heat protection. | Usually very good dexterity-to-protection ratio, especially in thin seamless-knit designs. | Cut-resistant does not mean cut-proof. Some designs have limited puncture, impact, or thermal protection. | Use the measured cut level required by the hazard assessment, and select a compatible coating for the work surface. |
| Aramid fiber | High-temperature handling, metalwork, glasswork, foundry support, and applications needing cut and heat resistance. | Good resistance to cuts, abrasion, and heat; maintains useful strength at elevated temperatures compared with many synthetic fibers. | Good to very high Construction, lining, and coating determine the final rating. | Not a universal chemical barrier. Strong acids, bases, and other chemicals may damage the fiber; verify compatibility. | Does not readily melt and can offer good flame and heat performance in certified designs, but protection limits vary. | Moderate dexterity; thicker or heat-rated styles can feel less flexible. | Heat resistance does not guarantee protection from molten metal splash, direct flame, or prolonged contact heat. | Choose a glove tested for the specific thermal hazard, including contact heat, convective heat, radiant heat, or molten-metal splash. |
| Neoprene | Chemical handling, cleaning, laboratory work, refrigeration-related tasks, and applications requiring a flexible liquid barrier. | Good resistance to selected acids, bases, alcohols, and some chemicals; good flexibility over a broad temperature range. | Moderate Thicker styles can improve durability but may reduce dexterity. | Useful for many chemicals, but no material protects against every chemical. Permeation and degradation data are essential. | Better low-temperature flexibility than many rigid plastics; not intended for direct flame or severe high-heat work unless certified. | Moderate dexterity; flock lining can improve comfort and moisture management. | May be unsuitable for aromatic and halogenated solvents or other specific chemicals. Check breakthrough times. | Use chemical-specific compatibility data and select a long cuff when splash exposure is possible. |
| PVC or vinyl-coated | General cleaning, wet handling, agriculture, fishing, light chemical work, and protection from oils in selected conditions. | Good waterproofing and practical resistance to many water-based substances; textured finishes can improve wet grip. | Moderate Usually less cut and heat resistant than specialized technical gloves. | Can resist selected acids, bases, salts, and alcohols, but performance depends on plasticizers, thickness, and chemical concentration. | Limited heat and flame performance; vinyl can harden in cold conditions and soften with heat. | Moderate dexterity; thicker gauntlets provide more coverage but reduce tactile control. | Can become brittle in cold conditions and may be attacked by some solvents, oils, or concentrated chemicals. | Choose PVC when waterproofing and general liquid handling are priorities, not for unknown or highly aggressive chemicals. |
| Butyl rubber | Specialized chemical handling involving certain highly permeating gases, esters, ketones, and concentrated chemical exposures. | Very low gas permeability and strong resistance to selected aggressive chemicals. | Moderate Usually selected for chemical protection rather than sharp-object protection. | Excellent against some chemicals but poor against others, including many hydrocarbons. Chemical-specific permeation data is mandatory. | Useful within the manufacturer's stated temperature range; not automatically flame-resistant. | Lower dexterity than thin disposable or coated gloves, especially in thick chemical gauntlet designs. | Expensive and highly task-specific; an incorrect material choice can create a serious false sense of security. | Use only after reviewing a current chemical-resistance and permeation chart for the exact substance and concentration. |
| Impact-protection glove with back-of-hand guards | Oil and gas support, construction, heavy equipment operation, material handling, and tasks with pinch or crush hazards. | Protective thermoplastic or rubber guards can reduce injury from impacts to the knuckles and fingers; palm coating provides grip. | Good impact protection Cut, puncture, abrasion, and impact performance are separate properties and must be checked individually. | Depends on the palm coating and liner. Back-of-hand guards are not necessarily chemical-resistant. | Generally limited unless the entire glove is designed and certified for thermal hazards. | Moderate dexterity; guards may restrict finger movement or make tool handling more difficult. | Impact protection does not prevent crushing from machinery or replace machine guarding and lockout procedures. | Look for a tested impact rating and ensure the guards do not interfere with controls, tools, or emergency release functions. |