| Product-standard conformity | AWWA C504 covers rubber-seated butterfly valves for waterworks service. | Current product datasheets, applicable standard edition, size and pressure-class coverage, and a clause-by-clause compliance statement. | Compare the documented product range and confirm that the offered valve configuration—not just the product family—meets the specified standard. |
| Design and pressure rating | Valve selection depends on the specified size, pressure class, operating conditions, and installation arrangement. | Rated-pressure documentation, design drawings, material specifications, and written confirmation of suitability for the project’s operating conditions. | Check that the proposed rating and configuration match the project specification; do not infer capability from maximum size alone. |
| Factory testing | Testing and acceptance should be evaluated against the applicable AWWA C504 requirements and purchase specification. | Sample test reports, test procedures, inspection records, instrument calibration records, and traceability to valve serial or production lot. | Prefer reports that identify the tested unit, acceptance criteria, test date, and responsible inspector. Confirm any project-specific tests separately. |
| Materials and traceability | Material suitability must be assessed against the valve specification, service conditions, and applicable standard requirements. | Bill of materials, material certificates, supplier records, heat or batch identification, and a documented method for maintaining traceability. | Compare the completeness of material records and verify that certificates can be linked to the delivered valve. |
| Drinking-water contact suitability | NSF/ANSI/CAN 61 addresses health effects of drinking-water system components in contact with drinking water. | Current, scope-matched certification or evaluation records for applicable wetted materials and coatings, where required by the project or jurisdiction. | Check the exact product, material, facility, and certification scope; a general company statement is not a substitute for applicable evidence. |
| Protective coatings | AWWA C550 is a reference for protective interior coatings for valves and hydrants. | Coating system specification, surface-preparation procedure, application and curing records, thickness inspection results, and repair procedures. | Compare the documented coating system and inspection controls with the project requirements and intended water service. |
| Quality management | ISO 9001 certification can indicate a quality-management system; it does not by itself certify a valve’s compliance with AWWA C504. | Current certificate, issuing body, covered manufacturing site, certification scope, and relevant production quality procedures. | Verify the certificate independently and distinguish management-system certification from product-standard conformity. |
| Actuation and operating capability | Actuator selection depends on valve size, operating torque, differential pressure, control method, and installation requirements. | Torque calculations, actuator sizing documents, interface details, operating limits, and testing records for the supplied assembly. | Compare the engineering basis for the complete valve-and-actuator assembly, rather than comparing actuator availability alone. |
| Manufacturing capacity and delivery | Capacity and lead time are supplier-specific and should be confirmed for the actual order scope. | Production schedule, current workload statement, capacity plan, critical-component sourcing plan, and a written delivery commitment. | Use order-specific evidence. Published capacity figures or general lead-time claims should not be treated as guaranteed delivery dates. |
| Inspection, documentation, and after-sales support | Inspection and handover requirements are normally defined by the purchase specification and project quality plan. | Inspection and test plan, document index, nonconformance process, warranty terms, spare-parts list, and service-response arrangements. | Compare document completeness, clarity of responsibilities, and the supplier’s ability to support commissioning and future maintenance. |
| Supplier-specific comparison status | Manufacturer performance data cannot be verified without identified suppliers and current, product-specific evidence. | Request the same evidence package from every shortlisted manufacturer and verify certificates, reports, and references independently. | No company names, brands, rankings, or unverified manufacturer-specific performance claims are included in this table. |